Monday, March 12, 2007

Sharks vs. Sharks

Radio and Internet Newsletter: NPR, CPB, Pandora all leaning towards 'legal response' to CPB. "'Left unchanged, these rates would be disastrous. It will not only end Internet radio, but will also stifle innovation as entrepreneurs and investors will abandon this space — leaving a vacuum that will be quickly filled by illegal unlicensed services with no intention of creating legitimate businesses,' a spokesperson for commercial webcaster Pandora said...

Numbers du jour

Google results for "2.0": 475,000,000

O'Reilly -- What Is Web 2.0 is #1.

RSS 2.0 Specification is #2.

Luna vs. Sol

Nice video.

Quote du jour

From The RIAA is and always has been an organization with it's head squarely up it's own posterior, Anonymous writes,

The music industry has been one of the single most shortsighted, foolishly run, lawyer fed industries in this country, and I am a member of it, being a professional musician for the last 30 years. Perhaps if the industry wasn't so interested in the ONE demographic they think will spend money, and catered even just a little bit to the REST of the music interested world, they wouldn't be in this situation. If you are over 25, they don't give a flying rat's butt about what you want to hear, or even what you will pay for. They just don't care if you aren't in the 13-25 year old demographic. And so, when the kids who grew up with computers can outsmart the old idiots running the RIAA without even trying, I can only laugh. Too bad they insist on destroying not only everyone trying to actually get MUSIC out to people, but their audience, too.

That's in response to Internet Radio on Death Row.

Why does what go with where?

Here's a quiz. What do these have in common?

Madison and Newspapers

OpenID and Moscow

Blogging and Singapore

Podcasting and Tokyo

Wheat and Brandon (Canada)

Corn and Cambridge (UK)

Crazy and Sydney

Schwag and St. Louis

Doctor and Thames Ditton (UK)

Terror and Puebla (Mexico)

Drugs and Vancouver

Blue and Kansas City

Green and Appleton (WI)

Disaster and Delhi

Rubber and Minneapolis

Cancer and St. Albans (UK)

Trace and Nashville

Budapest and 2.0

Dresses and Philadelphia

Girls and Delhi

Boys and Thames Ditton (UK)

Women and Washington (DC)

Men and New York

Freaks and Lisbon

Birth and Charlottesville (VA)

Death and Portland (OR)

Driving and Dublin

Panties and Salt Lake City

Pants and New York

Shirts and Tampa

Sunglasses and Rancho Santa Margarita (CA)

Hippies and Santiago (Chile)

Car and Bletchley (UK)

Dog and Denver

Definition and Manila (Philipines)

Deli and Ljubljana (Slovenia)

Subduction and Victoria

Chili and Rochester

Dig and Umea (Sweden)

Jabber and Havana

Linux and Bangalore

Bling and Auckland

Basketball and Raleigh (NC)

Zero and Porto Alegre (Brazil)

Hazmat and Washington (DC)

Reboot and Austin (TX)

Train and St. Albans (UK)

Dirt and Oklahoma City

Stupidity and Ottowa

Malware and Rome

Intelligence and Washington (DC)

Illusion and Brussels

Fashion and San Diego

Slime and Chester (PA)

No prizes. When somebody comes up with the answer (and you're disqualified if you work for you-know-who), I'll put links with each one. Eventually.

[Later...] And John Gotze is the winner! He posts, Easy :-) Highest ranking city name in Google Trends, i.e., http://www.google.com/trends?q=(first word) gives the city name.

Specifically, the trend query results show the location from which the most queries come. So for "dog" it's Denver. For "panties" it's Salt Lake City and for "birth" it's Charlottesville. I'll leave figuring out why to the rest of ya'll.