Sunday, January 30, 2005
Soundings
Looking for audio company on a long drive today, I downloaded what I assumed were podcasts of the Blogging, Journalism and Credibility conference, but alas, I just got html (dated Aug 6, 2004, oddly) telling me the page you are trying to reach is inaccessible because the user has exceeded their alloted daily quota. Ah well. Later, I guess.
Still, plenty of other stuff to hear along the way. Speaking of which, the latest Gillmor Gang is up.
On a crutch
What's going on with bluetooth phones or (PDAs that also phone)? Connect the dots and a clear picture emerges: some carriers are selling bluetooth phones that don't do what many customers expect of bluetooth phones.
I fully expect that this new model of the masses weighing in on products and services -- in effect engaging in a marketing dialogue with the creators and deliver's of these products and services -- to fundamentally alter and shape what ends up on real or virtual store shelves.
Yet so far the dialog appears to consist of 1) techies talking mostly to each other; 2) Techies talking to human heat shields at telcos and manufacturers 2) a class-action lawsuit.
I'm concerned about this trend (toward data-crippled cell phones), because I use my Sony Ericsson T637 as a mobile bridge to the Net. Being able to get onto the Net from anywhere in Cingular's footprint is a huge advantage, and one of the reasons Cingular has my business.
I've read a lot of posts at the links above, and still don't get is why they want to disable those features. What's the upside of not allowing customers to use the phones as a bridge to the Net? I'm sure there is one, but why bother?
I also have my doubts about "dialog" with many of the companies involved, especially if users (even the techies) continue calling themselves "consumers" instead of "customers." The former is a degraded form of the latter. Think of what Verizon did to bluetooth on the v710 to get an idea of the difference.
Comments here.